I picked up David Weinberger’s new book Everything is Miscellanous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder the other day. I’ve only read 30 pages or so but it’s great so far. It’s very thought provoking, especially for me as an LIS student. It’s got me thinking about the power of organization and how everyone’s organization is different. When I first picked up the book, I was struck by the dedication: To the librarians. I thought it was an interesting homage to the librarians who perhaps had influenced Weinberger. But when I got about 10 pages into the book, I soon realized how wrong I’d been. It’s more about encouraging librarians to read the book and think about the power of organization in a different way. And that there’s no “right” way to organize. The power lies in finding a system that allows each of us to organize in our own way, for our own goals, in our own context. And to help people find meaning in their organization. And then I read this quote from David Weinberger’s Everything is Miscellaneous blog and realized I was on the right track:
I said that the Aristotelian assumptions, combined with the limitations of paper-based knowledge, lead to authority over knowledge being placed in the hands of a few. The few tend to be highly qualified and often selfless, but it still is a power regime. Although I didn’t say this last night, that’s why I am so enamored of the idea that fundamentally the Internet is ours. In fact, another way to say what the book is about would be: Everything Is Miscellaneous is about meaning becoming ours.
Excellent. I am digging this book and cannot wait to read more. I encourage all you librarians (and non-librarians) out there to read it. It’s all about what I’ve been studying these last two years. And not.
May 12, 2007 at 10:36 am
Wait, you have time to read? Wow.
I think I get the dedication part. It’s To the Librarians, not To the Librarians… that makes sense know where he’s coming from. That idea kinds of builds on that LOC speech podcast of his I’ve plugged here before. Maybe I can get to it this summer.
May 12, 2007 at 10:39 am
Well, I don’t really have time, I’m just ignoring other things.
Yes, I think you’re right on with the dedication.
May 22, 2007 at 3:45 pm
Nicholas Carr dished out a huge response to page 9 over here, entitled Long Player. Quite interesting, if a little long-winded.
May 22, 2007 at 8:46 pm
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the comments and looking at the blog. It’s nice to hear from our audience.
I agree that Nicholas Carr’s review is interesting though I think it would have had much more power for me if he’d read past page 9. It’s hard for me to give him much cred if he didn’t read the rest of Weinberger’s arguments.
That said, I think negative reviews are great to read because it forces you to give it a more critical eye. Shelly (Burningbird) Powers didn’t like the book much either. And I think her review of it is very thoughtful and thought provoking. And she read the whole thing.